Corrections and Updates
Our approach to corrections
Every research review on InsulinResistance.org passes multiple editorial checks and a credentialed medical review before publication. We still make mistakes. When we do, we fix them, note the change on the affected page, and log substantive corrections here.
How to report an error
If you believe a claim on the site is inaccurate, a source has been misrepresented, or a citation is broken, please emailinfo@pacshores.co with:
- The URL of the page in question
- The specific claim or citation you are concerned about
- The source you believe supports a different conclusion (if applicable)
Our editorial team reviews reports and responds within a few business days. Reports from named clinicians, researchers, or original authors of cited papers are prioritized.
What counts as a correction vs. an update
Corrections address specific factual errors: an incorrect number, a misattributed source, a broken link, a mischaracterized study finding. Corrections are made as soon as they are verified.
Updates reflect new evidence or new clinical guidance that materially affects the review's conclusions. Updates are more substantial than corrections and may involve rewriting sections, adding new citations, or adjusting the review's framing to match the current evidence base.
When either happens, the last-reviewed date on the page is refreshed and a note is added to the change log below.
Change log
Substantive corrections and updates are logged here in reverse chronological order. Minor fixes (typos, formatting, dead links restored) are made without a log entry.
No substantive corrections or updates have been logged yet. This log will populate as the site matures.
Retraction policy
If a review contains an error significant enough that the underlying conclusion cannot be defended, we withdraw the review, replace the page with a brief statement explaining the reason, and log the retraction here. Retracted pages remain accessible so that anyone who linked to or cited the review can see the retraction rather than encountering a broken link.
Related
- Editorial policy — how reviews are researched, checked, and reviewed
- Medical Review Board — the clinicians who review our work
- Contact — how to reach us